The Arc’teryx Bora Mid One Million Step Review: 514,061 Step Update

The 1,000,000 Step Review has moved on! Find the 713, 174 and 1,000,876 step updates HERE and HERE.

There are, I assume, few things in the world worse than a product planning meeting. Sure, I am happy to point out product flaws, and I even might be able to come up with a few big ideas to solve them, but as soon as we turn to the nitty gritty details I simply can’t summon the energy to care. What zipper should we choose? Blue or cyan? Should this buckle be 1.5 or 1.8 cm? To all of these my answer is a cold blank stare.

And this is precisely why I do not have a job at Arc’teryx. Arc’teryx is where the detail fanatics thrive, where the strange good people who can spend years on a zipper design find a home. Pick up a piece of Arc’teryx gear and you can feel the weight of the many meetings, memos, product testing, and incessant drive for perfection. Don’t believe me? Go to REI, grab an Arc’teryx rain jacket and look for winkles in the seam taping. You will find none.

Perfection though, can be a bit boring. Take Patagonia as a counter example. While the Arc’teryx employees were sitting in their 387th meeting discussing the relative qualities of polymer compositions for one zipper on a single pack, the Patagonia product team was out doing some “field testing” at the local beach. The fact that their office is a fun place to be comes through in everything they make, meaning they come up with some neat, interesting, maybe even whimsical stuff. But also, this:

Which is a long way of saying that we need people like those at Arc’teryx in the world, because while the details can be boring, when you get them right the effect can be profound. This brings us to the topic of this review: the Arc’teryx Bora Mid hiking boots.



Arc’teryx footwear is radically different from all the hiking shoes that came before it. First, some of the shoes in Arc’teryx’s line are actually two separate shoes: 1.) A tough outer, and 2.) A removable inner which can be changed out for different conditions (e.g., insluated, waterproof, etc.). This design choice has been the focus of nearly all the press surrounding these shoes (for example, HERE, HERE, andHERE); however, I believe this is a red herring. The thing that really gives these boots the potential to be special is that the outer boot is not made of leather, but rather of a laminate that is simultaneously much tougher and much lighter.

Arc’teryx believes that these changes will will fundamentally alter our expectations of hiking footwear. That’s big talk. To test that claim I (or rather, my wife Angie, HAPPY FATHERS DAY TO ME!) plunked down $300ish dollars and hit the trail with a brand new pair of Bora Mids. However, there is a fundamental problem with the way shoe reviews work: because reviewers have to handle a huge number of shoes per year, they really only get to test out their shoes for a short period of time. In this way reviews at places like Backpacker (where, full disclosure, I have done a little bit of writing) are really something more like unboxings and first takes. Enter our 1,000,000 step review.

The 1,000,000 step review is actually spread out across multiple reviews. First I do an unboxing and quick take, which you can find HERE. This segment covers out of box fit and finish, goes over specific features of the boots, and gives many many more details on the removable inner-boot system. I really suggest you read it. Then, I do periodic updates around 250,000, 500,000, and 750,000 steps. The 250,000ish step update is HERE. Again, I really suggest you read along because I won’t rehash all the details every time. Just in case that isn’t your jam…

STEPS 1-294,853 SUMMARY:  

WHY DID I PICK THESE INSTEAD OF THOSE WITH REMOVABLE INNER: Arc’teryx makes these boots with both removable and non-removable liners, with the removable liner model costing an additional $50. The liners themselves are supposed to make the boot more flexible, allowing you to choose the amount of insulation necessary for the conditions, but are only available Gore-Tex and Insulated models. I live in Arizona where I will never need an insulated inner, and Arc’teryx is not making the non-waterproof liner I would actually use. So, I elected to save the $50 and get the simpler boot and I suggest you do the same.

OUT-SOLE QUALITY: Much stronger and thicker than other boots in its class (e.g., Salomon Quest 4D, Lowa Renegade, etc.)

IN-SOLE QUALITY: Terrible, immediately replaced with superfeet green.

WATERPROOFING: Stood in full bathtub for 30 min, no leaks. Since that first test they have been rained on, drug through creeks, and across many dewy fields with not even a tiny bit of leaking.

LOOKS: Pure-sex. I don’t even mind wearing them in public.

STEPS 1-294,853 CONCLUSION: Great, but I wish they had offered a non-waterproof inner boot.



From the 294,853 step update:

In the first review, I mentioned that these boots were comfortable. What I did not realize at that time is that the laminate material that makes up the outer continues to break in more slowly than comparable nubuck leather boots. As such, these boots, which were already comfortable to begin with, have broken in even more to become an almost perfect mold for my feet. The minimal heel slipping that was apparent in the beginning is gone, the annoying clicking sound these boots can make when they are first worn is gone, and the general sense of clunckiness that came with such a stiff pair of boots when first worn is gone. By combining the out of box wearability of light hikers, and the made for your foot feeling of well broken in full grain leather uppers, these boots once, again, combine the best features of both worlds of hiking footwear.

Not to toot our own horn too much, but this type of observation is exactly what makes an extended review valuable– some of the early reviews noted that these boots did not live up to their expectations from a comfort perspective, but with the boot-hours I have logged I have to believe that these reviewers just underestimated the fact that these boots, unlike others in their class, get better with time.

I am going to sound like a broken record here, but these boots have continued to get better with time. From generally comfortable out of the box to wonderful at 300,00 steps, these boots feel like they were made for me at 500,000 steps. They are the most comfortable shoes, not just boots, I have ever worn, but it took a while to get there.

For what it is worth my brother in law (who runs an incredible photography site) has reported a similar pattern with his pair of Bora Mids. The shoe version of this boot, which I wear for canyoneering (review HERE), broke in a little faster and are equally wonderful.


My time with boots is a history of violence. I live in Phoenix, and I generally train with a 50ish lb pack on the local mountain preserves. Even worse, I am a heavier guy (190 lbs) and I supinate really badly, placing all the wear one one side of the outsole. If I get bored, sometimes I’ll run a little bit with the pack on.

All together this means I eat through boots. In 2013 I ripped lugs off the outsole on 2 pairs of Salomon Quest 4Ds (including one in less than 3 hikes!), one pair of Salomon Comet 3Ds, and one pair of Lowa Renegades. People like me haunt the dreams of boot designers everywhere.

In my earlier reviews I pointed out that the Bora Mids had the strongest outsoles I had ever seen of a boot in this class.  514,061 steps in here is how they look: IMG_20160405_070407IMG_20160405_070417

Wowza. The only other soles I have had hold up this well are the radically stiffer, heavier, and generally worse Asolo TPS 520.

As to the rest of the boot:


The outers as a whole seem to be holding up well. Elastic bands on the top of the liner cuff are still tight.


The binding point between the breathable (light gray above) and stronger (black above) is where the boot flexes as you walk. Despite my constant poking and prodding there are no signs of the laminate separating on either side of either boot.


Still got some of that red Grand Canyon dirt on the toes! Also, the rand is in good shape.


I hesitate to bring up waterproofing because, as the greatest hiker of our generation, Andrew Skurka, points out, waterproofing boots often causes more problems than it solves. To sum up Andrew’s point, waterproofing almost always fails, and when it fails, the waterproof membrane then stops your feet from drying. Therefore, IF you are going to have a waterproof membrane in your boot it damn well better work 100% of the time.


The Gore-Tex layer in the Bora Mids has proven exceptionally durable. I am not a product engineer, but I suspect that this is because the Mids have almost no seams, and seams are the most common failure point for water proof membranes.

This is an enormous differentiating point for these boots relative to the competition. I have owned at least 10 pairs of Salomon boot/shoes over the last decade. Most of these leaked out of the box, and all of them leaked after ten hikes. 515,061 steps in the Bora Mids don’t leak, full stop.


When I was a teenager my dad took me to REI to get my first good pair of boots. It was one of their garage sales, and I came home with a pair of (slightly) worn Lowa Renegades. Coming from a pair of old Hi Techs, which had apparently been assembled by elephants, the change was instantaneous. Suddenly I could hike further faster than I had ever thought possible. Blisters were gone and hiking was fun in the way hiking is fun as a child again. I wore those boots until my foot wore through the outsole on the middle of the Tibetan Plateau. I loved them, but these are better.

Did you miss parts one and two? Read them HERE and HERE.

Want to buy them? Try these links: 

Please support Lesser Places and purchase them using these links for MENS orWOMENS.  For the removable inner Bora2 Mids click here for MENS, womens not available at this time. Doing so costs you nothing extra and we get a little extra cash to keep this site running.


See them in action: 








Cool memories from when they were on my feet:_DSC9602_DSC9665_DSC9688_DSC9075_DSC9081-2_DSC9507_DSC6653_DSC6214_DSC7747_DSC7780_DSC6138

Disclaimer: This post, and all posts on LesserPlaces, may contain affiliate links– links that allow me to receive a small kickback at no additional cost to you when you shop through them. This is how we keep the lights on. 

Don’t forget you can follow Lesser Places by email, or on Twitter, Tumblr, andInstagram using the menu at the top of the page. Or, you could click the links below to share with your friends directly. Or, copy and paste the URL someplace you think people will find it useful. Or, print the story, place it in a nice envelope, and send it to one of your friends. Basically we support any way you want to share.  No, we aren’t above begging.


Max Wilson is a graduate student studying ecology at Arizona State University. He writes here at Lesser Places, occasionally for, and even more occasionally for scientific journals. You can follow him on twitter @maxomillions.



18 thoughts on “The Arc’teryx Bora Mid One Million Step Review: 514,061 Step Update

      1. I don’t know why, but I go through hiking shoes and boots a lot. Maybe I just walk wrong. The durability and comfort in these ones sounds promising.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. That’s the problem with getting outside all the time– lots of boots to buy! I’ve had particularly bad luck with Salomons. They are so so so comfortable, but I just kill their soles.


  1. Hi Max. I have a pair of Acrux FL Approach Shoes and absolutely love the Vibram Megagrip soles. Do you know if the Bora’s are made with Megagrip? I’m a huge fan of the FL’s Megagrip soles and the approach shoes are awesome for walking up steep rack faces. Looking around on the web, I haven’t found details about the compound used in the Bora’s shoes. Any comments are appreciated.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi Tom– Good News/Bad News. First the bad: though I cannot find any info on the web to confirm this I am 99.999999999% sure that the Bora’s do not use megagrip. Good news: I own a pair of Acrux FL approach shoes as well with a comparable number of steps and the outsole on the Bora’s has held up MUCH better. Though megagrip is more durable than any approach sole I’ve had, there still seems to be the classic grip vs. durability trade off.

      That being said, I’ve been very pleased with the grip on the Boras. While they don’t have the uncanny grip of the Arcuxs they still feel more grippy than other boots in class. If anything, the lack of flex in the midsole, not the stickiness of the outsole, will be what holds you back while scrambling with these boots.

      Hope that helps!


  2. Hi Max, Thanks very much for your detailed review(s). Looking forward to the 1M step review! I won’t make it before pulling the trigger, as I am in the market for a backpacking/mountain scramble boot for my upcoming July trip to Banff, and am zeroing in on the Bora or Bora2. They seem to have recently come out with a new version that has leather uppers (BORA² MID LEATHER HIKING BOOT MEN’S, found on the Arc’terxy site, not sure if posting links is allowed). Your review leads me to believe that one of the benefits of the Bora is NOT having leather uppers for no chance of water logging and breathability. I’m interested in your opinion if any on this version of the Bora. I’m probably not going to go the leather route, just interested in your opinion (if any, considering you probably don’t have hands on experience with the leather variant).

    Also, I’m leaning towards the Bora2 because of the potential use of the liner as a camp shoe as well as the possibility of them coming out with a non-goretex liner eventually and fulfilling their modular system dream.


    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi, Graeme– thanks for reading! I’ll take your questions one at a time:

      On the leather issue– To be upfront, I haven’t handled the leather version. That being said, as you picked up from the review, in my opinion what truly makes these boots special is the use of laminates instead of leather. The laminate is light, cannot get water logged, breaths well, and seems durable. We’ll see how well it holds up through the life of the boot, but if it were my money I would go with the laminate knowing what I know now.

      On the camp shoe– I know Arc’teryx advertises this, but would be hesitant to do it. The reason why is that gore-tex layer is in the liner, so the very first sharp thing you step on is going to give you some leaky boots. Maybe I’m just a klutz who lives in the desert, but I know it wouldn’t be too long before I kicked something thorny, put a hole in the goretex, and ended up with the worst of both worlds.

      On the modular dream system– I run through a pair of boots every 1-2 years, so IF Arc’teryx ever releases the breathable liners (which I cannot, for the life of me, figgure out why they haven’t) I will probably need a new pair of boots by then anyways. Your mileage may vary, but I just couldn’t justify the extra cost in the name of hoping for different liners which may or may not exist before the boots are shot anyways.

      I hope that helps you with your decision! Enjoy Banff!

      Liked by 2 people

      1. A comment on the non-existant, non-GTX liners. After speaking with an Arcteryx rep, the issue with not creating a non-GTX liner is due to the fact that they feature a GORE-TEX logo on the outer boot. It sounded like it was a contractual thing on both ends where if a boot (Arc or otherwise, I assume) has Gore branding on it, it legally cannot be anything other than waterproof. I was told that Arc has to plans at this time to create a non-GTX version of the Bora. Kind of a drag, I was hoping for a different answer.


      2. Thanks for the heads up! It makes sense that they would be working on this– it is just too big of a market to pass up. On the upside, my Arcuxs are non-GTX and they are fantastic, so maybe worth the wait?


    1. Not stupid at all! I have three of the five models of footwear that Arc’teryx puts out, and the answer for me varies by shoe. For the Acrux SL approach shoe, no. For the Acrux FL approach shoe, not once broken in. For the Bora Mids boots, most definitely. Though they are light, the Boras are still big, tough boots at their heart. Break in was frankly a bitch, even with good socks.

      That being said, if its just that you don’t like the look of big hiking socks above the boot, I’ve found that the Smart Wool PhD Mid-hight crew socks are just the right length so that they barely show on top.

      Hope that helps!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.